|
|
|
Use this tool to learn about websites, specifically the one you just entered.
If you find some aspect of it inappropriate it is not our fault.
If you are the owner of this website: yes we are a real search engine, we do have a real web crawler called FyberSpider and you can block it if you feel the urge.
We are in the process of updating this tool. Until we are done just use our search results to check the inclusion status of your site. Submit your site to major search engines within 48 hours. Find out if your site has been cataloged by top search engines for only $8.99. Below you will see site info taken directly from the URL you entered in real time. This is also known as our URL Breakdown tool and can be used independently of our site info tool. 0
kasia in a nutshell: Spam sucks Archives
This is just a sample of the content found on this website. Please visit the website to read the entire page.
"kasia in a nutshell
Crunchy on the outside, sarcasm on the inside
February 05, 2005
Controlling spam with postfix
Steve has a pretty good tip on rejecting spammers with Postfix HELO controls .
In addition to that, I also use a combination of spamassassin and header checks to drop spam at the door:
In main.cf :
header_checks = regexp:/etc/postfix/header_checks
In /etc/postfix/header_checks :
/^X-Spam-Flag:.YES/ REJECT spam
What happens here? Spamassassin adds the X-SPAM-FLAG header and postfix rejects the message based on that.. This of course is only recommended if you're certain your spam rules are not providing false positives.
Posted at 12:02 PM
comments? (0)
permalink
January 08, 2005
Spam breeds more spam
As an experiment, I left two typical comment spams in one of my entries (now deleted) only long enough to be archived by Google. I was curious what would happen. In less than 24 hours since the original comment spam arrived the entry was spammed, nay, bombarded with 356 brand new spam comments.
The spammer found my entry via google searching for one of the couple dozen urls spammed in the comment body. Here is a screenshot of what google cache was still showing today. (The spam was actually removed already).
That was pretty fast, wasn't it?
In other words:
Unremoved spam + fast google caching = lots more spam.
Obviously just removing the comments is no longer good enough, time to work on preventing them from arriving in the first place (I have a hangup about using mod_perl, so no mt_blacklist).
Posted at 09:13 PM
comments? (9)
permalink
December 24, 2004
Reverse psychology in spam
Now this is amusing, a feedback item received at dslr :
Hi, I am Radhika from <removed> site. We came across your site, where there are some links to <removed&"
....
read entire page
|
Links to Pages on Other Domain Names
|
|
Links to Pages on the Same Domain Name
|
|
