|
|
|
Use this tool to learn about websites, specifically the one you just entered.
If you find some aspect of it inappropriate it is not our fault.
If you are the owner of this website: yes we are a real search engine, we do have a real web crawler called FyberSpider and you can block it if you feel the urge.
We are in the process of updating this tool. Until we are done just use our search results to check the inclusion status of your site.
Submit your site to major search engines within 48 hours.
Find out if your site has been cataloged by top search engines for only $8.99.
Below you will see site info taken directly from the URL you entered in real time. This is also known as our URL Breakdown tool and can be used independently of our site info tool.
The Tea Makers: Why cbcwatch sucks
This is just a sample of the content found on this website. Please visit the website to read the entire page.
"The Tea Makers
Presented by Ouimet
alphonse.ouimet@gmail.com
They offered me the office, offered me the shop. They said I'd better take anything they'd got. Do you wanna make tea at the CBC? Do you wanna be, do you really wanna be a cop?
Wednesday, August 24, 2005
Why cbcwatch sucks
by Ouimet
Here's the truth: I discovered that site some time ago, and what hooked me was its 'exposing the bias' tagline. I was earnestly interested in having our bias exposed. But it only contains news stories lifted from various sources I can find elsewhere, usually accompanied with a snarky tagline. Ironically, some of the stories are about how unbiased we are. Comments are buried and combative. They do, however, copy and paste with precision and dutifully retype print items tat I can't find online. Monkeys can also do this. Inexplicably, the 'editors' are anonymous. I may be a gutless coward, but at least I risk getting fired. What could they possibly be risking? I guess what disappoints me most is that it could have been better. I rarely expect to get the truth about the CBC when I read the newspaper or some online pundit. Quite often they get it wrong in the first sentence, which saves me from reading the rest of the article. I'm sure you know what I mean. What with this lockout we now have a lot more of it around, 90% of it wrong. Except for John Doyle, who is 90% right, at least this week. If I thought it was worth it, I might make my own web site, and poke some holes into some of these news stories. I would choose the big ones, probably, because people read these the most. Until then, just read what Tod Maffin has to say. But you knew that already.
11 Comments:
"
....
read entire page
|
Links to Pages on Other Domain Names
|
|
Links to Pages on the Same Domain Name
|
|
