|
|
|
Use this tool to learn about websites, specifically the one you just entered.
If you find some aspect of it inappropriate it is not our fault.
If you are the owner of this website: yes we are a real search engine, we do have a real web crawler called FyberSpider and you can block it if you feel the urge.
We are in the process of updating this tool. Until we are done just use our search results to check the inclusion status of your site.
Submit your site to major search engines within 48 hours.
Find out if your site has been cataloged by top search engines for only $8.99.
Below you will see site info taken directly from the URL you entered in real time. This is also known as our URL Breakdown tool and can be used independently of our site info tool.
Students for the Judiciary: The Growing Imbalance between Freedom and Security
This is just a sample of the content found on this website. Please visit the website to read the entire page.
"Students for the Judiciary
...is a non-partisan student-led campaign to provide objective information on judges under consideration for lifetime appointments to the federal judiciary. We are committed to the ideal of an independent judiciary and believe that judicial nominees should be able to divorce their personal political opinions from their ability to interpret the Constitution. As such, qualified nominees should be able to secure a broad base of political support.
Wednesday, June 22, 2005
The Growing Imbalance between Freedom and Security
In my last post , I wondered whether Alberto Gonzales' poor, poor record on safeguarding American liberties and freedom would make him a worse Supreme Court Justice than some of the other possible nominees of President Bush. I wasn't able to answer that question for myself. I might have seemed to be begging another question, however. Isn't it necessary to compromise freedom for the sake of security? No. Absolutely not. This is a false tradeoff, and the assumption that security and freedom are mutually exclusive is a dangerous one. Indeed, our goal in defending ourselves against terrorists is precisely to ensure our way of life, our liberty, and our pursuit of happiness. Make no mistake: the security debate itself, such as it is, does much harm and little good. A very important piece in the Washington Post demonstrates this beyond any reasonable doubt. (It is the first in a series you can reach through links alongside the article.) It concludes that for all the damage done to American freedoms, the administration has made very little progress in protecting us against terrorism. The numbers are revealing. President Bush, with Alberto Gonzales by his side, claimed that "federal terrorism investigations have resulted in charges against more than 400 suspects, and more than half of"
....
read entire page
|
Links to Pages on Other Domain Names
|
|
Links to Pages on the Same Domain Name
|
|
