|
|
|
Use this tool to learn about websites, specifically the one you just entered.
If you find some aspect of it inappropriate it is not our fault.
If you are the owner of this website: yes we are a real search engine, we do have a real web crawler called FyberSpider and you can block it if you feel the urge.
We are in the process of updating this tool. Until we are done just use our search results to check the inclusion status of your site.
Submit your site to major search engines within 48 hours.
Find out if your site has been cataloged by top search engines for only $8.99.
Below you will see site info taken directly from the URL you entered in real time. This is also known as our URL Breakdown tool and can be used independently of our site info tool.
Complaint: SEC v. Anamar Communications, Inc. and Brett R. Mallory
This is just a sample of the content found on this website. Please visit the website to read the entire page.
"Home Previous Page
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,
Plaintiff
v.
ANAMAR COMMUNICATIONS, INC. and
BRETT R. MALLORY,
Defendants.
: : : : : :
Civil Action No. _____________
COMPLAINT
Plaintiff U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, for its Complaint against defendants Brett R. Mallory and Anamar Communications, Inc., alleges the following:
SUMMARY
1. This is an emergency enforcement action to stop the fraudulent offering of stock in Anamar Communications, Inc. ("Anamar"), a purported Internet service provider. The scheme, which capitalizes on the investing public's fascination with start-up companies, alternative telephone technologies and the Internet, was orchestrated by Brett R. Mallory ("Mallory"), Anamar's founder and CEO. Since August 2001, Mallory has raised at least $130,000 from at least 14 investors in four states, including Massachusetts, Ohio, Virginia and California, promising them that they would double their money in as little as ninety (90) days. Several investors borrowed money from family or high interest credit cards to invest in the scheme and some invested substantial portions of their life savings. 2. Mallory falsely told investors that Verizon Communications, Inc. ("Verizon"), a large telecommunications company, had agreed to purchase Anamar because Anamar owned the exclusive right to distribute a new web-basedpayphone. Mallory also falsely told investors that a stock investment in Anamar was essentially risk-free because even if the Verizon deal fell through, Verizon had agreed to pay an "opt-out" fee to Anamar and the investors could sell their shares back to Anamar. In fact, Verizon"
....
read entire page
|
Links to Pages on the Same Domain Name
|
|
