|
|
|
Use this tool to learn about websites, specifically the one you just entered.
If you find some aspect of it inappropriate it is not our fault.
If you are the owner of this website: yes we are a real search engine, we do have a real web crawler called FyberSpider and you can block it if you feel the urge.
We are in the process of updating this tool. Until we are done just use our search results to check the inclusion status of your site.
Submit your site to major search engines within 48 hours.
Find out if your site has been cataloged by top search engines for only $8.99.
Below you will see site info taken directly from the URL you entered in real time. This is also known as our URL Breakdown tool and can be used independently of our site info tool.
Pharyngula::Scott Adams digs a deeper hole
This is just a sample of the content found on this website. Please visit the website to read the entire page.
"Pharyngula has moved to http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/
Tuesday, November 15, 2005
Scott Adams digs a deeper hole
info
09:10 AM
0 Trackbacks
Technorati links
Format for printing
Pirate mode
Tag: Creationism
PZ Myers
• 181 Comments ( last page )
Scott Adams replies to my previous castigation . He is not very convincing. His arguments seem to be:
He was just joking…
…but evolution really is unpersuasive…
…but he isn't a creationist…
…he was just parroting creationist arguments that he didn't really believe…
…oh, and by the way, here are some more fallacious arguments against evolution that he made up.
Ho hum. Another pompous nutbag with a case of Intelligent Design credulity. So what else is new? Certainly not his defense: the "I was just joking" and "I was just testing you" reactions were old and tired in preschool and on usenet.
Trackback url: http://pharyngula.org/index/trackback/3365/cMDXMBN5/
Comments:
# 48834 : Rick @ shrimp and grits — 11/15 at 11:05 AM
Now just hang on a minute.
On one side, we have a cartoonist who draws a nice, but rather repetitive cartoon about people who work in offices.
On the other side, we have a biologist , whose life's work revolves around the study of biology.
The cartoonist says that the biologist is not a "credible" source for information about biology .
I think the person with the credibility problem here is pretty obvious - and it isn't the biologist with the credibility problem.
Anyone care to tell me what I'm missing here?
"
....
read entire page
|
Links to Pages on Other Domain Names
|
|
Links to Pages on the Same Domain Name
|
|
