|
|
|
Use this tool to learn about websites, specifically the one you just entered. If you find some aspect of it inappropriate it is not our fault. If you are the owner of this website: yes we are a real search engine, we do have a real web crawler called FyberSpider and you can block it if you feel the urge.
We are in the process of updating this tool. Until we are done just use our search results to check the inclusion status of your site.
NathanNewman.org
This is just a sample of the content found on this website. Please visit the website to read the entire page. "NathanNewman.org My Writings-Links Main Writing Populist Columns The Nation American Prospect NetAction Other Tech Academic Election 2000 Older Political -------------------------- Web Log Tech Page National Budget Simulation Key Blogs Alas a Blog American Samizdat Altercation Brad DeLong Cursor Daily Kos Eschaton Liberal Oasis MaxSpeak Rittenhouse Review Public Nuisance Republic of Seabrook Seeing the Forest Sideshow- Avedon Carol Talk Left Talking Points Tapped Two Tears in a Bucket ---------------------------- Other WebLog Links Link in your Weblog Issue Links Main Links Page Conservative Groups Economics Issue Areas Labor Links 1000 Law Media Politics & Government Progressive Organizations Tech WebLogs ---------------------------- Link in your Weblog About Me Who Am I C.V. Contact Me Mailing List Ten Search this site: * Email me « What Should Courts Do? Main Like Watching a Car Crash » June 10, 2005 Canada High Court's Bad Judicial Review Another examples of why I hate judicial review of legislation via Canada. Canada's high court has opened the way to rich people in Quebec getting to buy care unavailable to poor people in violation of federal law providing equal care for all. The Court's justification is a Quebec constitutional clause protecting a person's "life and personal security, inviolability and freedom." Now, if people are facing some delay in health care service, there are a lot of ways to address that problem other than giving the wealthy special access to private care. Poor Americans face that every day, yet no constitutional court jumps in to mandate health care help for them. But the problem is that courts are particular" .... read entire page
|
|
|