Use this tool to learn about websites, specifically the one you just entered.
If you find some aspect of it inappropriate it is not our fault.
If you are the owner of this website: yes we are a real search engine, we do have a real web crawler called FyberSpider and you can block it if you feel the urge.
Is It Cataloged?
We are in the process of updating this tool. Until we are done just use our search results to check the inclusion status of your site.
Find out if your site has been cataloged by top search engines for only $8.99.
Below you will see site info taken directly from the URL you entered in real time. This is also known as our URL Breakdown tool and can be used independently of our site info tool. 0
Page Title
Bowling for Columbine
Stripped Text Content
This is just a sample of the content found on this website. Please visit the website to read the entire page.
"About The Author
Internal navigation:
Return to main page Mooreexposed.com
Stupid White Men rebuttal
Bowling for Columbine rebuttal
Dude Where's my Country rebuttal
Fahrenheit 9/11 rebuttal
Moore and Narcissism
Moore and Terrorism
Reply to Moore's Waco attacko page
Order "Michael Moore Is A Big Fat Stupid White Man" by David Hardy and Jason Clarke (6 weeks on NY Times Bestseller List)
BOWLING FOR COLUMBINE
Documentary or Fiction?
[Fuer eine Zusammeenfassung dieser Seite auf Deutsch klicken Sie hier ]
Michael Moore's "Bowling for Columbine" won the Oscar for best documentary. Unfortunately, it is not a documentary, by the Academy's own definition.
The injustice here is not so much to the viewer, as to the independent producers of real documentaries. These struggle in a field which receives but a fraction of the recognition and financing of the "entertainment industry." They are protected by Academy rules limiting the documentary competition to nonfiction.
Bowling is fiction. It makes its points by deceiving and by misleading the viewer. Statements are made which are false. Moore leads the reader to draw inferences which he must have known were wrong. Indeed, even speeches shown on screen are heavily edited, so that sentences are assembled in the speaker's voice, but which were not sentences he uttered. Bowling uses deception as its primary tool of persuasion and effect.
A film which does this may be a commercial success. It may be entertaining. But it is not a documentary. One need only consult Rule 12 of the rules for the Academy Award: a documentary is a non-fictional movie.
The point is not that Bowling is biased. No, the point is that Bowling is deliberately, seriously, and consistently deceptive."
....
read entire page
