FyberSearch   
mathematicallycorrect.com/usnoadd.htm - Site Info
Submit Your Site To Top Search Engines
Just $14.99!
Find Out Which Search Engines Have Included Your Site
Just $8.99!
Learn To Rank Higher In Search Results
Just $24.99!
Instantly Create Targeted Ads With No Setup Fees
.50+ Cents/mo
Advertise On 225+ Search Engines
Just $4.00/mo
 
Site Info

Use this tool to learn about websites, specifically the one you just entered.

If you find some aspect of it inappropriate it is not our fault.

If you are the owner of this website: yes we are a real search engine, we do have a real web crawler called FyberSpider and you can block it if you feel the urge.


Is It Cataloged?

We are in the process of updating this tool. Until we are done just use our search results to check the inclusion status of your site.
Submit your site to major search engines within 48 hours.
Find out if your site has been cataloged by top search engines for only $8.99.
Below you will see site info taken directly from the URL you entered in real time. This is also known as our URL Breakdown tool and can be used independently of our site info tool.


Page Title

Why the U.S. Department of Education's recommended math programs don't add up


Stripped Text Content

This is just a sample of the content found on this website. Please visit the website to read the entire page.


"Reproduced with permission from the April 2000 issue of American School Board Journal. Copyright © 2000, National School Boards Association. MATH PROBLEMS Why the U.S. Department of Education's recommended math programs don't add up By David Klein What constitutes a good K-12 mathematics program? Opinions differ. In October 1999, the U.S. Department of Education released a report designating 10 math programs as "exemplary" or "promising." The following month, I sent an open letter to Education Secretary Richard W. Riley urging him to withdraw the department's recommendations. The letter was coauthored by Richard Askey of the University of Wisconsin at Madison, R. James Milgram of Stanford University, and Hung-Hsi Wu of the University of California at Berkeley, along with more than 200 other cosigners. With financial backing from the Packard Humanities Institute, we published the letter as a full-page ad in the Washington Post on Nov. 18, 1999, with as many of the endorsers' names and affiliations as would fit on the page. Among them are many of the nation's most accomplished scientists and mathematicians. Department heads at more than a dozen universities--including Caltech, Stanford, and Yale--along with two former presidents of the Mathematical Association of America also added their names in support. With new endorsements since publication, there are now seven Nobel laureates and winners of the Fields Medal, the highest award in mathematics. The open letter was covered by several newspapers and journals, including American School Board Journal (February, page 16). Although a clear majority of cosigners are mathematicians and scientists, it is sometimes overlooked that experienced education administrators at the state and national level, as well as educational psychologists and education researchers, also endorsed the letter. (A complete list is posted at http://www.mathematicallycorrect.com.) University professors an"
....
read entire page


Links to Pages on Other Domain Names

Website Address     Anchor Text     Visit Site
http://www.asbj.com     american school board journal     Visit Site



Links to Pages on the Same Domain Name

Website Address     Anchor Text     Visit Site
http://mathematicallycorrect.com/usnoadd.htm/ftp:/ math.stanford.edu/pub/papers/milgram     a preliminary analysis of sat i mathematics data for imp schools in california     Visit Site
http://mathematicallycorrect.com/usnoadd.htm/ftp:/ math.stanford.edu/pub/papers/milgram/andover-repor t.htm     outcomes analysis for core plus students at andover high school one year later     Visit Site