FyberSearch   
in.gov/judiciary/opinions/previous/archive/06030501.mpb.html - Site Info
Submit Your Site To Top Search Engines
Just $14.99!
Find Out Which Search Engines Have Included Your Site
Just $8.99!
Learn To Rank Higher In Search Results
Just $24.99!
Instantly Create Targeted Ads With No Setup Fees
.50+ Cents/mo
Advertise On 225+ Search Engines
Just $4.00/mo
 
Site Info

Use this tool to learn about websites, specifically the one you just entered.

If you find some aspect of it inappropriate it is not our fault.

If you are the owner of this website: yes we are a real search engine, we do have a real web crawler called FyberSpider and you can block it if you feel the urge.


Is It Cataloged?

We are in the process of updating this tool. Until we are done just use our search results to check the inclusion status of your site.
Submit your site to major search engines within 48 hours.
Find out if your site has been cataloged by top search engines for only $8.99.
Below you will see site info taken directly from the URL you entered in real time. This is also known as our URL Breakdown tool and can be used independently of our site info tool.


Page Title

Converted file mpb


Stripped Text Content

This is just a sample of the content found on this website. Please visit the website to read the entire page.


"FOR PUBLICATION ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT,     ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE: Eric Simmons: STEVE CARTER SHANE E. BEAL      Attorney General of Indiana Marion, Indiana GRANT H. CARLTON ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT,    Deputy Attorney General Anthony Davis:     Indianapolis, Indiana CRAIG PERSINGER Marion, Indiana IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA ERIC SIMMONS, ) ANTHONY DAVIS, ) ) Appellants-Defendants, ) ) vs. ) No. 27A02-0409-CR-807 ) STATE OF INDIANA, ) ) Appellee-Plaintiff. ) APPEAL FROM THE GRANT SUPERIOR COURT The Honorable Randall L. Johnson, Judge Cause No. 27D02-0206-FA-56 27D02-0206-FA-57 June 3, 2005 OPINION - FOR PUBLICATION BARNES, Judge Case Summary     Anthony Davis and Eric Simmons appeal their convictions for Class A felony conspiracy to deal in cocaine in excess of three grams. Davis also appeals his sentence. We affirm. Issues     We restate the issues as: whether there is sufficient evidence to support Davis’s and Simmons’s convictions for conspiracy to deal in cocaine in excess of three grams when neither of the two individual transactions involved more than three grams of cocaine; and whether the jury rendered inconsistent verdicts. Davis raises another issue, which we restate as whether he was properly sentenced. Facts See footnote     Late in the evening of June 4, 2002, or early in the morning o"
....
read entire page