|
|
|
Use this tool to learn about websites, specifically the one you just entered. If you find some aspect of it inappropriate it is not our fault. If you are the owner of this website: yes we are a real search engine, we do have a real web crawler called FyberSpider and you can block it if you feel the urge.
We are in the process of updating this tool. Until we are done just use our search results to check the inclusion status of your site.
GOP Bloggers :: Why Not Indict the Reporter?
This is just a sample of the content found on this website. Please visit the website to read the entire page. "The Difference Between Democrats and Republicans Main The Sunday Morning Talk Shows (Lineup) October 28, 2005 Why Not Indict the Reporter? Patrick Fitzgerald apparently determined that Lewis Libby did not reveal any national security secrets, according to the indictment. He was indicted for being the odd-man out in a conversation, as Michael Ledeen points out . it [the indictment] says that Libby lied to the grand jury (and elsewhere the FBI) when he testified that he told (Cooper, Miller or Russert) things that in fact he did not tell (Cooper, Miller or Russert). If that is right, it means that this poor man may well have been indicted because his memory of those conversations differs from the journalists'. And Fitzgerald chose/wanted? to believe the journalists' memories . Pfui. To this non-lawyer, that's not good enough to shake up the staff of the vice president of the United States. While it is not difficult to get an indictment, it seems that Libby's lawyers will have plenty to work with. Posted by Jonathan R. on October 28, 2005 04:44 PM Trackback Pings TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.gopbloggers.org/mt/majority.cgi/2410 Comments Horse pucky. I t" .... read entire page
|
|
|