Use this tool to learn about websites, specifically the one you just entered.
If you find some aspect of it inappropriate it is not our fault.
If you are the owner of this website: yes we are a real search engine, we do have a real web crawler called FyberSpider and you can block it if you feel the urge.
Is It Cataloged?
We are in the process of updating this tool. Until we are done just use our search results to check the inclusion status of your site.
Visit this website or continue reading for info about this site saved by the FyberSearch web crawler FyberSpider.
Date & Time Cataloged
June 26th, 2008 at 1:26pm
Headers
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 18:20:53 GMT Server: Apache/2.0.59 (Unix) mod_ssl/2.0.59
OpenSSL/0.9.7a Connection: close Transfer-Encoding: chunked Content-Type: text/html
Page Title
RFC 2821 (rfc2821) - Simple Mail Transfer Protocol
Stripped Text Content
This is just a sample of the content found on this website. Please visit the website to read the entire page.
"
[ RFC Index | RFC Search | Usenet FAQs | Web FAQs | Documents | Cities ] Alternate Formats: rfc2821.txt | rfc2821.txt.pdf RFC 2821 - Simple Mail Transfer Protocol Search the Archives Display RFC by number Comments about this RFC: RFC 2821: ... also didn't cover distinctions of autoreply-- so-that it doesn't redouble ... by Mr. Raymond Kenneth Petry (10/26/2004) RFC 2821: In order to reduce the ammount of forged mail and viruses spreading via SMTP,... by vtanger (9/22/2003) RFC 2821: 4.1.1.1 ABNF notation for ehlo-ok-rsp, first line is missing SP and should be: ... by Bob Platt (4/21/2006) RFC 2821: Issue about spams. Would like to propose an extension to the standard. 1)... by Hemant Desai (5/26/2004) RFC 2821: [expanded: one more] ... doesn't cover mail-mail attachments (I want to... by Mr. Raymond Kenneth Petry (10/26/2004) RFC 2821: There should be an equivalent for SMTP servers of what NICs are for the Domain... by jboy (11/28/2003) RFC 2821: ... doesn't cover mail-mail attachments (I want to attach another message to an... by Mr. Raymond Kenneth Petry (10/26/2004) RFC 2821: Para 4.2.5 refers to 'permanent error stats (5yz)' twice. It seems to me (also... by Mathias (10/15/2006) RFC 2821: From Section 5 of RFC 2821. Currently, If an MX query fails then an A record is... by Slacker (5/28/2005) RFC 2821: don't listen to Chris - Obsolete is perfectly acceptable as a verb. by Terrance Wilburforce (4/13/2006) RFC 2821: The second paragraph under section "4.1.1.1 Extended HELLO (EHLO) or HELLO... by Aaron Sj (3/13/2007) RFC 2821: Very difficult to understand. It's very Complicated. I'd rather read a tutorial... by ScullShot (7/20/2005) RFC 2821: Section 6.1 There is no need for the Mailserver that receives this bounce to... by Bernd Schwaegerl (4/30/2004) RFC 2821: There is no verb "to obsolete". The word "obsolete" is an adjective. So, in the... by Chris Colenso-Dunne (7/27/2005) RFC 2821: adding to section 3.1 Session Initiation An s"
....
read entire page