FyberSearch   
faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2821.html - Site Info
Submit Your Site To Top Search Engines
Just $14.99!
Find Out Which Search Engines Have Included Your Site
Just $8.99!
Learn To Rank Higher In Search Results
Just $24.99!
Instantly Create Targeted Ads With No Setup Fees
.50+ Cents/mo
Advertise On 225+ Search Engines
Just $4.00/mo
 
Site Info

Use this tool to learn about websites, specifically the one you just entered.

If you find some aspect of it inappropriate it is not our fault.

If you are the owner of this website: yes we are a real search engine, we do have a real web crawler called FyberSpider and you can block it if you feel the urge.


Is It Cataloged?

We are in the process of updating this tool. Until we are done just use our search results to check the inclusion status of your site.

Visit this website or continue reading for info about this site saved by the FyberSearch web crawler FyberSpider.


Date & Time Cataloged

June 26th, 2008 at 1:26pm


Headers

Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 18:20:53 GMT
Server: Apache/2.0.59 (Unix) mod_ssl/2.0.59
OpenSSL/0.9.7a
Connection: close
Transfer-Encoding: chunked
Content-Type: text/html


Page Title

RFC 2821 (rfc2821) - Simple Mail Transfer Protocol


Stripped Text Content

This is just a sample of the content found on this website. Please visit the website to read the entire page.


" [ RFC Index | RFC Search | Usenet FAQs | Web FAQs | Documents | Cities ] Alternate Formats: rfc2821.txt | rfc2821.txt.pdf RFC 2821 - Simple Mail Transfer Protocol Search the Archives Display RFC by number        Comments about this RFC: RFC 2821: ... also didn't cover distinctions of autoreply-- so-that it doesn't redouble ... by Mr. Raymond Kenneth Petry (10/26/2004) RFC 2821: In order to reduce the ammount of forged mail and viruses spreading via SMTP,... by vtanger (9/22/2003) RFC 2821: 4.1.1.1 ABNF notation for ehlo-ok-rsp, first line is missing SP and should be: ... by Bob Platt (4/21/2006) RFC 2821: Issue about spams. Would like to propose an extension to the standard. 1)... by Hemant Desai (5/26/2004) RFC 2821: [expanded: one more] ... doesn't cover mail-mail attachments (I want to... by Mr. Raymond Kenneth Petry (10/26/2004) RFC 2821: There should be an equivalent for SMTP servers of what NICs are for the Domain... by jboy (11/28/2003) RFC 2821: ... doesn't cover mail-mail attachments (I want to attach another message to an... by Mr. Raymond Kenneth Petry (10/26/2004) RFC 2821: Para 4.2.5 refers to 'permanent error stats (5yz)' twice. It seems to me (also... by Mathias (10/15/2006) RFC 2821: From Section 5 of RFC 2821. Currently, If an MX query fails then an A record is... by Slacker (5/28/2005) RFC 2821: don't listen to Chris - Obsolete is perfectly acceptable as a verb. by Terrance Wilburforce (4/13/2006) RFC 2821: The second paragraph under section "4.1.1.1 Extended HELLO (EHLO) or HELLO... by Aaron Sj (3/13/2007) RFC 2821: Very difficult to understand. It's very Complicated. I'd rather read a tutorial... by ScullShot (7/20/2005) RFC 2821: Section 6.1 There is no need for the Mailserver that receives this bounce to... by Bernd Schwaegerl (4/30/2004) RFC 2821: There is no verb "to obsolete". The word "obsolete" is an adjective. So, in the... by Chris Colenso-Dunne (7/27/2005) RFC 2821: adding to section 3.1 Session Initiation An s"
....
read entire page


Image Links Found on this Site

http://www.faqs.org/images/rfc/vrule.gif



Links to Pages on Other Domain Names

Website Address     Anchor Text     Visit Site
http://www.city-data.com/     cities     Visit Site



Links to Pages on the Same Domain Name

Website Address     Anchor Text     Visit Site
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/     rfc index     Visit Site
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfcsearch.html     rfc search     Visit Site
http://www.faqs.org/faqs/     usenet faqs     Visit Site
http://www.faqs.org/contrib/     web faqs     Visit Site
http://www.faqs.org/docs/     documents     Visit Site
http://www.faqs.org/ftp/rfc/rfc2821.txt     rfc2821 txt     Visit Site
http://www.faqs.org/qa/rfcc-1368.html     rfc 2821 also didnt cover distinctions of autoreply so that it doesnt redouble     Visit Site
http://www.faqs.org/qa/rfcc-196.html     rfc 2821 in order to reduce the ammount of forged mail and viruses spreading via smtp     Visit Site
http://www.faqs.org/qa/rfcc-3075.html     rfc 2821 4 1 1 1 abnf notation for ehlo ok rsp first line is missing sp and should be     Visit Site
http://www.faqs.org/qa/rfcc-911.html     rfc 2821 issue about spams would like to propose an extension to the standard 1     Visit Site
http://www.faqs.org/qa/rfcc-1367.html     rfc 2821 expanded one more doesnt cover mail mail attachments i want to     Visit Site
http://www.faqs.org/qa/rfcc-356.html     rfc 2821 there should be an equivalent for smtp servers of what nics are for the domain     Visit Site
http://www.faqs.org/qa/rfcc-1366.html     rfc 2821 doesnt cover mail mail attachments i want to attach another message to an     Visit Site
http://www.faqs.org/qa/rfcc-3479.html     rfc 2821 para 4 2 5 refers to permanent error stats 5yz twice it seems to me also     Visit Site
http://www.faqs.org/qa/rfcc-2070.html     rfc 2821 from section 5 of rfc 2821 currently if an mx query fails then an a record is     Visit Site
http://www.faqs.org/qa/rfcc-3060.html     rfc 2821 dont listen to chris obsolete is perfectly acceptable as a verb     Visit Site
http://www.faqs.org/qa/rfcc-8591.html     rfc 2821 the second paragraph under section 4 1 1 1 extended hello ehlo or hello     Visit Site
http://www.faqs.org/qa/rfcc-2264.html     rfc 2821 very difficult to understand its very complicated id rather read a tutorial     Visit Site
http://www.faqs.org/qa/rfcc-828.html     rfc 2821 section 6 1 there is no need for the mailserver that receives this bounce to     Visit Site
http://www.faqs.org/qa/rfcc-2290.html     rfc 2821 there is no verb to obsolete the word obsolete is an adjective so in the     Visit Site
http://www.faqs.org/qa/rfcc-1520.html     rfc 2821 adding to section 3 1 session initiation an smtp opening message should     Visit Site
http://www.faqs.org/qa/rfcc-8791.html     rfc 2821 to accomodate greylisting which is an anti spam procedure for requiring     Visit Site
http://www.faqs.org/qa/rfcc-649.html     rfc 2821 rfc 2821 realy sux and this book is useless i havent got a clue     Visit Site
http://www.faqs.org/qa/rfcc-1899.html     rfc 2821 the security problems of smtp are addressed by csv its like what vtanger     Visit Site
http://www.faqs.org/qa/rfcc-1516.html     rfc 2821 simple example of syntax re this is a way you can test to see if a mail     Visit Site
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2820.html     rfc 2820 access control requirements for ldap     Visit Site
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2822.html     rfc 2822 internet message format     Visit Site
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc821.html     rfc 821     Visit Site
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1035.html     rfc 1035     Visit Site
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc974.html     rfc 974     Visit Site
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1123.html     rfc 1123     Visit Site
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2476.html     rfc 2476     Visit Site
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc822.html     rfc 822     Visit Site
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1047.html     rfc 1047     Visit Site
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc937.html     rfc 937     Visit Site
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2440.html     rfc 2440     Visit Site
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2234.html     rfc 2234     Visit Site
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1985.html     rfc 1985     Visit Site
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2298.html     rfc 2298     Visit Site
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2979.html     rfc 2979     Visit Site
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2045.html     rfc 2045     Visit Site
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1847.html     rfc 1847     Visit Site
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2156.html     rfc 2156     Visit Site
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2373.html     rfc 2373     Visit Site
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1870.html     rfc 1870     Visit Site
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1869.html     rfc 1869     Visit Site
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1652.html     rfc 1652     Visit Site
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1056.html     rfc 1056     Visit Site
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1034.html     rfc 1034     Visit Site
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2047.html     rfc 2047     Visit Site
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1891.html     rfc 1891     Visit Site