FyberSearch   
faculty.washington.edu/eloftus/Articles/JaneDoe.htm - Site Info
Submit Your Site To Top Search Engines
Just $14.99!
Find Out Which Search Engines Have Included Your Site
Just $8.99!
Learn To Rank Higher In Search Results
Just $24.99!
Instantly Create Targeted Ads With No Setup Fees
.50+ Cents/mo
Advertise On 225+ Search Engines
Just $4.00/mo
 
Site Info

Use this tool to learn about websites, specifically the one you just entered.

If you find some aspect of it inappropriate it is not our fault.

If you are the owner of this website: yes we are a real search engine, we do have a real web crawler called FyberSpider and you can block it if you feel the urge.


Is It Cataloged?

We are in the process of updating this tool. Until we are done just use our search results to check the inclusion status of your site.
Submit your site to major search engines within 48 hours.
Find out if your site has been cataloged by top search engines for only $8.99.
Below you will see site info taken directly from the URL you entered in real time. This is also known as our URL Breakdown tool and can be used independently of our site info tool.


Page Title

The price of bad memories


Stripped Text Content

This is just a sample of the content found on this website. Please visit the website to read the entire page.


"Skeptical Inquirer 2002, 26, #3, pp 24-32 (Part 1) Elizabeth F. Loftus UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98195 USA Who Abused Jane Doe? The Hazards of the Single Case History: Part I. Elizabeth F. Loftus & Melvin J. Guyer Abstract Case histories make contributions to science and practice, but they can also be highly misleading. We illustrate with our re-examination of the case of Jane Doe; she was videotaped twice, once when she was six years old and then eleven years later when she was seventeen. During the first interview she reported sexual abuse by her mother. During the second interview she apparently forgot and then remembered the sexual abuse. Jane's case has been hailed by some as the new proof of recovery of repressed or dissociated traumatic memories, and even as proof of the reliability of recovered memories of repeated abuse. Numerous pieces of "supporting evidence" were given in the original article for believing that the abuse occurred. Upon closer scrutiny, however, there are reasons to doubt not only the "supporting evidence," but also that the sexual abuse ever happened in the first place. Our analysis raises several general questions about the use of case histories in science, medicine, and mental health. There is a cautionary tale not only for those professionals who advance the case history, but also for those who base their theories on it or would readily accept it as proof. -The Authors ---------------- Case histories have a long and cherished tradition in science. They are compelling anecdotes, often powerful enough to generate entire theories of behavior. Freud built the edifice of psychoanalytic theory "
....
read entire page