|
|
|
Use this tool to learn about websites, specifically the one you just entered.
If you find some aspect of it inappropriate it is not our fault.
If you are the owner of this website: yes we are a real search engine, we do have a real web crawler called FyberSpider and you can block it if you feel the urge.
We are in the process of updating this tool. Until we are done just use our search results to check the inclusion status of your site.
Submit your site to major search engines within 48 hours.
Find out if your site has been cataloged by top search engines for only $8.99.
Below you will see site info taken directly from the URL you entered in real time. This is also known as our URL Breakdown tool and can be used independently of our site info tool.
How Not To Review Mediumship Research: Understanding the Ultimate Reviewer's Mistake
This is just a sample of the content found on this website. Please visit the website to read the entire page.
"How
Not To Review Mediumship Research:
Understanding
the Ultimate Reviewer's Mistake *
Gary E. Schwartz,
Ph.D.
"If it is real, it
will be revealed;
If it's fake, we'll find the mistake."
Motto, Human Energy
Systems Laboratory
Opening Quotation, The Afterlife Experiments
"I do not have control
over my beliefs."
Ray Hyman, Ph.D.
Summary
Is
it appropriate in science to ignore or dismiss important facts, consciously
or unconsciously, in order to maintain one's preferred interpretations or beliefs?
Is
it appropriate to ignore important historical, procedural, and empirical facts
when drawing scientific conclusions about a body of research?
Consider
the following scientific statement:
"When the total set of findings are considered, the simplest and
most parsimonious explanation that presently accounts for the largest amount
of the data - including the extraordinary observations or "dazzle"
shots - is the survival of consciousness hypothesis."
Is
this a subjective interpretation or "belief" of a scientist? Or, is
it a reasoned conclusion based upon a systematic and complete review - not a
selective review - of the data?
Most
rational scientists agree that the credibility and integrity of a review of
a body of research is that the review includes all the important information,
n"
....
read entire page
|
Links to Pages on the Same Domain Name
|
|
