FyberSearch   
cropwatch.org/cropwatch12.htm - Site Info
Submit Your Site To Top Search Engines
Just $14.99!
Find Out Which Search Engines Have Included Your Site
Just $8.99!
Learn To Rank Higher In Search Results
Just $24.99!
Instantly Create Targeted Ads With No Setup Fees
.50+ Cents/mo
Advertise On 225+ Search Engines
Just $4.00/mo
 
Site Info

Use this tool to learn about websites, specifically the one you just entered.

If you find some aspect of it inappropriate it is not our fault.

If you are the owner of this website: yes we are a real search engine, we do have a real web crawler called FyberSpider and you can block it if you feel the urge.


Is It Cataloged?

We are in the process of updating this tool. Until we are done just use our search results to check the inclusion status of your site.
Submit your site to major search engines within 48 hours.
Find out if your site has been cataloged by top search engines for only $8.99.
Below you will see site info taken directly from the URL you entered in real time. This is also known as our URL Breakdown tool and can be used independently of our site info tool.


Page Title

The Cropwatch Series


Stripped Text Content

This is just a sample of the content found on this website. Please visit the website to read the entire page.


"The Cropwatch Series Cropwatch 12   Opinion: Cropwatch Critiques the EU Inventory of Ingredients in Cosmetic Products: II. Perfume & Aromatic Materials.     Copyright Ó Cropwatch Sept 2005.       Pre-amble The SCCP produced an Opinion (SCCNFP/0389/00 Final, adopted Oct. 2000) that the 1 st Update of the Inventory of Ingredients employed in Cosmetic Products Section II: Perfume and Aromatic Materials “had usefully improved the Inventory”. Unfortunately nobody else much agrees.   The need for such an inventory dates back to Article 5a of the Cosmetics Directive 76/768/EEC, which stipulates that “the Commission shall compile an inventory of ingredients employed in cosmetic products … shall publish the inventory and shall update it periodically”. More  specifically under a mandate issued by the responsible service of the European Commission (SCCNFP/1891/98) : “ that the SCCNFP shall act as a resource of scientific expertise to the European Commission, in terms of advising on (amongst other things) the scientific accuracy and validity of proposed entries, and the outstanding needs of the existing text/proposed improvements in subsequent updates…”   Apparently the SCCNFP met experts from European Industry and worked in collaboration with the JRC (Joint Research Centre) of the Commission, and co-operated with EFFA. "
....
read entire page