|
|
|
Use this tool to learn about websites, specifically the one you just entered. If you find some aspect of it inappropriate it is not our fault. If you are the owner of this website: yes we are a real search engine, we do have a real web crawler called FyberSpider and you can block it if you feel the urge.
We are in the process of updating this tool. Until we are done just use our search results to check the inclusion status of your site.
Should Doonesbury be saved? from The Editors' Weblog
This is just a sample of the content found on this website. Please visit the website to read the entire page. "4 11d 1711 Go to Guardian Unlimited home UK news World news Newsblog Election 2005 news Election 2005 blog ---------------------- Archive search Arts Books Business EducationGuardian.co.uk Film Football Jobs Life MediaGuardian.co.uk Money The Observer Online Politics Shopping SocietyGuardian.co.uk Sport Talk Travel ---------------------- Audio Email services Special reports The Guardian The weblog The informer The northerner The wrap ---------------------- Advertising guide Crossword Dating Headline service Syndication services Events / offers Help / contacts Information Living our values Newsroom Notes & Queries Reader Offers Style guide Travel offers TV listings Weather Web guides Working at GNL ---------------------- Guardian Weekly Money Observer Read today's paper 45c Sign in Register 245b The Editors' Weblog Monday September 12 2005 « How are your fingers? Home A new day, a new paper » Should Doonesbury be saved? By Jeannette Page / Your reaction 03:02pm For all you Doonesbury fans out there - all is not lost. After requests on this blog, I asked Ian Katz, the editor of G2 and the man who made the decision to launch without Doonesbury, to explain his reasons. He says G2 is very squeezed for space at the back of the book and it would be difficult to accommodate a second strip. But his mind is open about bringing the man back. "We felt Doonesbury had a small, committed following but was not read by a large readership. If we're wrong about the number of people who read and love it, we may have to think again," he says. Comments Doonesbury is almost as important to the Guardian as Steve Bell ( who is lets face" .... read entire page
|
|
|