|
|
|
Use this tool to learn about websites, specifically the one you just entered.
If you find some aspect of it inappropriate it is not our fault.
If you are the owner of this website: yes we are a real search engine, we do have a real web crawler called FyberSpider and you can block it if you feel the urge.
We are in the process of updating this tool. Until we are done just use our search results to check the inclusion status of your site. Submit your site to major search engines within 48 hours. Find out if your site has been cataloged by top search engines for only $8.99. Below you will see site info taken directly from the URL you entered in real time. This is also known as our URL Breakdown tool and can be used independently of our site info tool. 0
Brian Beutler: Obama vs. Clinton, left vs. right
This is just a sample of the content found on this website. Please visit the website to read the entire page.
"Brian Beutler
Languishing in obscurity since 2007
Beutler Approved Sites
Grist
Ezra Klein
Matt Yglesias
Brad Plumer
The Plank
Spencer Ackerman
Feministing
Dana Goldstein
Andrew Sullivan
Tapped
« Banal observation(s) of the day
Main
What's an insurgent? »
July 27, 2007
Obama vs. Clinton, left vs. right
I think the escalating rhetorical battle the two senators is perhaps the only helpful instance of campaign jousting I've ever seen. At the same time, I only think I'll believe that as long as Barack Obama wins, or at least puts up a good show. Because what we are seeing is, in as close to an unfiltered way as possible, a standoff between a status quo foreign policy and a much more constructive (though I hesitate to say new) direction.
Certainly what you're hearing from Clinton and Obama is a healthier debate than what you're hearing from journalists. Clinton's basic position is that Obama has, by announcing his intent to engage enemy leaders, proven that he's too naive to set the country's foreign policy. Obama, on the other hand, contends that Clinton's foreign policy ideas are too similar to George Bush's for comfort. As far as I'm concerned, I think Obama's argument is basically correct and Hillary's argument is totally nuts, but in any case both arguments are pretty close facsimiles to what the two candidates actually believe about foreign policy.
The press, on the other hand, is doing exactly what you'd expect. Conservatives are saying exactly what you'd expect--that Hillary's correct, and that diplomacy is bad and that nobody will ever support Obama's idea. David Brooks wrote , "He continues to attract huge crowds and huge money, but he also
continues to make rookie mistakes, like saying "
....
read entire page
|
Links to Pages on Other Domain Names
|
|
Links to Pages on the Same Domain Name
|
|
